Yes, appears more likely to be https://efloraofindia.com/2013/09/18/symplocos-cochinchinensis-var-laurina/ Was it planted ?
On Mon, 9 Sept 2024 at 22:09, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote: > Drupe shape looks completely different from *Symplocos theifolia* D. Don. > Looks like something related to *Symplocos cochinchinensis *group. > http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=210002156 > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:43 AM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> Thank you Mr. Garg ! >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:44 AM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Saroj ji. >>> Only one species have distribution in India, Bhutan and Nepal as >>> per this publication Taxonomic revision of the Symplocos nakaharae >>> complex (Symplocaceae) with special reference to fruit morphology >>> <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1759-6831.2012.00223.x> >>> by Bo LIU Hai-Ning QIN- Journal of Systematics and Evolution 51 (1): 94–114 >>> (2013) (*Abstract*- Over 70 species and infra specific taxa have been >>> described in the Symplocos nakaharae (Hayata) Masam. complex >>> (Symplocaceae), and the taxonomy of this complex has been controversial.To >>> provide a rational taxonomic revision of the complex, extensive field >>> observations were carried out and approximately 800 herbarium specimens, >>> covering the whole distribution range, were examined to evaluate the >>> taxonomic importance of morphological characteristics. Our studies >>> recognized 13 species and one subspecies, including S. boninensis, S. >>> henryi, S. kawakamii, S. lucida, S. nakaharae, S. migoi, S. multipes, S. >>> pergracilis, S. setchuensis, S. shilanensis, S. tanakae, S. tetragona, S. >>> theifolia, and S. lucida subsp. howii comb. nov. One new combination is >>> made and two new synonyms, S. ernestii Dunn var. pubicalyx C. Chen syn. >>> nov. and S. kuroki Nagam. syn. nov., are recognized. Two identification keys >>> are provided, based primarily on flower and fruit characters. Detailed >>> morphological descriptions and geographical distribution information of the >>> 14 taxa are given.) with details as below: >>> >>> 1. *Symplocos theifolia *D. Don in Prodr. Fl. Nepal. 145. 1825. non >>> Hayata. 1916. ut ‘theaefolium’. — Eugeniodes theifolium O. K. in Revis. >>> Gen. Pl. 2: 409. 1891. ut ‘theaefolium’. —Symplocos racemosa DC. in >>> Prodr.8:255.1844.nonRoxb.1832.necWightexC.B. Clarke. 1882. Type: Nepal. >>> Narainhetty, Hamilton s.n. (holotype, BM!, photo). >>> Symplocos phyllocalyx C. B. Clarke in Fl. Brit. >>> India3:575.1882.Type:India.Sikkim,8–12000ft.,J. D. Hooker & c. s.n. >>> (lectoholotype, K!; isolectotypes, M!, photo, W!, photo). >>> Symplocos warburgii Brand in Pflanzenr. (Engler) >>> Symploc.6:66.1901.Type:India.Nilgiri,Warburg560 (holotype, B, destroyed). >>> Symplocos discolor Brand in Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 3: 216. >>> 1906. Type: China. Yunnan, >>> 188806-07,Delavay4331(holotype,P!,photo;isotypes,K!, P!, photo). >>> Symplocos wilsonii Brand in Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 3: 216. Dec. >>> 1906. non Hemsl. (July 1906). —Symplocos ernestii Dunn in J. Linn. Soc., >>> Bot. 34: 499. 1911. ut ‘ernesti’. —Dicalix ernestii (Dunn) Migo in Bull. >>> Shanghai Sci. Inst. 13 (3): 201. 1943. Type: >>> China.WHupei,1900-04-24,Wilson58(lectoholotype, >>> E!;lectoisotypes,A!,E!,K!,NY!,photo,P!,photo,US!, photo); Sutchuen >>> oriental, District de Tchen-K´eou-Tin, R. P. Farges 796 (lectoparatype, >>> US!, photo). Symplocos loheri Brand in Philipp. J. Sci. 7: 32. 1912. >>> Type: Philippines. 1906-03-06, A. Loher 6192 (holotype, SING!, photo; >>> isotype, M!, photo). >>> Symplocos xanthoxantha H. L´ev. in Bull. G´eogr. Bot. 24: 283. 1914. >>> Type: China. Tibet: Mo-Tsou, 3000 m, 1913-04, E. E. Maire 648 (holotype, >>> E!). >>> Symplocos coronigera H.L´ev.inRepert.Spec.Nov. >>> RegniVeg.10:431.1912.Type:China.Kweichou:Majo, 1907-07-24, Cavalerie 3106 >>> (holotype, E!; isotype, P!, photo). >>> Symplocos potaninii Gontsch. in Not. Syst. Herb. >>> Hort.Petrop.5:100.1924.Type:China.Szechwan:Mt. Omei, Potanin, 2-4-1893 >>> (holotype & isotype, LE). >>> Symplocos elephantis Guillauminin Bull.Soc.Bot. France 71: 279. 1924; >>> Fl. G´en. IndoChine 3: 998. 1933. Type: Cambodia. Kampot, Mts. de >>> l’El´ephant, 1000 m, 1919-09-07, Poilane 239 (syntypes, P!, photo, US!, >>> photo); 900 m, 1919-08-15, Poilane 341 (syntypes, A!, BM!, photo, CAS!, >>> photo, NY!, photo, US!, photo). >>> *Dicalix shinodanus *Migo in Bull. Shanghai Sci. Inst. 13 (3): 205. >>> 1943. Type: China. Yunnan: C. W. Wang 68262 (isotypes, LBG!, NAS!). >>> * Symplocos ernestii *Dunn var. pubicalyx C. Chen syn. nov. in Fl. >>> Yunnan 16: 807 (304–305). 2006. Type: China. Yunnan: Jingdong, M. K. Li >>> 1209 (holotype, KUN!); 1963-06-08, Z. H. Yang et al. s.n. (paratype, >>> KUN!). >>> >>> Small evergreen trees or shrubs, to 15 m high. Twigs green, glabrous, >>> ridged. Petioles 6–12(–16) mm long; leaf blades leathery, 8–12×2–3cmlong, >>> glabrous on both sides, base cuneate, margin subentire or serrated, apex >>> long acuminate; midvein adaxially prominent, lateral veins 8–12 per side. >>> Inflorescences simple or basally branched, axillary spikes, 0.8–2.5 cm long, >>> axis puberulent; bracts and bracteoles persistent, broadly obovate, 1–3 mm >>> long, often glabrous. Calyx glabrous or puberulent, margin ciliolate,lobes >>> orbicular. Corolla white, 3–5 mm long, deeply 5-lobed. Stamens 15–50, >>> pentadelphous or inconspicuous pentadelphous. Disc soft pilose. Drupes >>> ellipsoidal, 6–15 × 4–7 mm, apex with erect or spread persistent calyx >>> lobes, 3loculed, 1 or 2 locules often fertile, mesocarp woody, endocarp >>> surface smooth, chartaceous. >>> Distribution and habitat: Bhutan, Cambodia, China (south of the Yangtze >>> River), India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, and Philippines >>> occurring in mixed forests on slopes below 2600 m. >>> Phenology: Fl. Mar.–May, fr. Jun.–Aug. >>> Note: Symplocos theifolia own has echinate pollen, adding to its >>> chartaceous endocarp and fertile locules (Fig. 2: L, M). It should be >>> easily separated from other species in the complex. >>> Wu (1987) considered it different from S. phyllocalyx mainly because >>> “the stones are not divided into 3 pyrenes and the stamens are not >>> obviously pentadelphous”. We checked many specimens and found that the two >>> characters are not consistent among individuals. Apart from that, the two >>> species are indistinguishable, so they should be conspecific. Symplocos >>> ernestii var. pubicalyx was published based on its pubescence on calyx in >>> Flora Yunnanica (Gao, 2006). However, the pubescence should be carefully >>> considered as an identification character in Symplocaceae (Hardin, 1966). >>> After examination of specimens referred in the original description and >>> other specimens in KUN, we found the pubescence on calyx of S. theifolia is >>> not an effective taxonomic character. In fact, both glabrous and pubescence >>> on calyx were found in the same inflorescence, therefore, no obvious >>> correlation exists between the pubescent calyx and the environment. As a >>> result, it is treated as a new synonym here. >>> >>> So we can use this name for our plants. >>> >>> On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 21:45, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Taxonomic revision of the <i>Symplocos nakaharae</i >>>> ...onlinelibrary.wiley.com › doi › pdf >>>> <https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=13&ved=2ahUKEwjDytq2yurnAhXlxzgGHbTTCScQFjAMegQIAhAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fdoi%2F10.1111%2Fj.1759-6831.2012.00223.x%2Fpdf&usg=AOvVaw1V2UhG8cu5G-MakKkxgCpI> >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 6:13 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think Symplocos kuroki >>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/s/symplocaceae/symplocos/symplocos-lucida> >>>>> only. >>>>> >>>>> Some bigger appearing fruits seems to have been infected. >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>> From: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 17:36 >>>>> Subject: Re: SK 2420 30 January 2020 >>>>> To: efloraindia <[email protected]>, J.M. Garg < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 5:51 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 5:50 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 5:49 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear members, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Location: Godawari >>>>>>>> Date: 8 January 2020 >>>>>>>> Elevation: 2056m. >>>>>>>> Habitat: Wild >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Synplocos? Drupe look like S.cochinchinensis but plant does not. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With regards, >>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>> >>>>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna' >>>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1> >>>>> >>>>> Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia >>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian >>>>> Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in >>>>> the world- more than 3,000 members & 3,00,000 messages on 23.8.18) or >>>>> Efloraofindia >>>>> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a >>>>> species database of more than 13,000 species & 3,00,000 images of which >>>>> more than 2,00,000 images are directly displayed on 30.8.19). >>>>> >>>>> The whole world uses my Image Resource >>>>> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a >>>>> thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants >>>>> etc. >>>>> (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as >>>>> per Creative Commons license attached with each image. >>>>> >>>>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of >>>>> India'. >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> With regards, >>> J.M.Garg >>> >>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna' >>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1> >>> >>> Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia >>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>. >>> >>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian >>> Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group >>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in the >>> world- more than 3,000 members & 3,00,000 messages on 23.8.18) or >>> Efloraofindia >>> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a species >>> database of more than 13,000 species & 3,00,000 images of which more than >>> 2,00,000 images are directly displayed on 30.8.19). >>> >>> The whole world uses my Image Resource >>> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a >>> thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. >>> (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as >>> per Creative Commons license attached with each image. >>> >>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of >>> India'. >>> >> -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFA9%2BDBeGo1ZpA892OCSntbNdfPwUU_enRbe8r5Csbv5NA%40mail.gmail.com.
