OK Surjit ji, Thank you.
Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 7:30 PM surajit koley <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you Saroj ji for the id. > > With regards, > > Surajit Koley > > > On Tue, 10 Feb, 2026, 11:42 am Saroj Kumar Kasaju, <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I guess this is *Sida rhombifolia* L. >> >> Thank you >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 at 10:44:40 PM UTC+5:45 >> Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:128413] Sida rhombifolia L. (?) from Hooghly >> To: Neil Soares <[email protected]> >> Cc: efloraofindia <[email protected]> >> >> >> Neil Sir, >> >> I also noticed *Sida rhombifolia* L. var. retusa, in the net. To make >> the matter more confusing Flora of China has four varieties of *Sida >> alnifolia*! >> >> Too complicated to me. >> >> Thank you very much for taking care and elaborating on Sida. >> >> Regards, >> >> surajit >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Neil Soares <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> To complicate matters further..... >> >> Dr. Almeida in his 'Flora of Maharashtra' classifies this as Sida >> rhombifolia L.var retusa [Linn.] Masters. >> >> With regards, >> Neil Soares. >> >> --- On *Tue, 9/4/12, surajit koley <[email protected]>* wrote: >> >> >> From: surajit koley <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:128413] Sida rhombifolia L. (?) from Hooghly >> To: "Neil Soares" <[email protected]> >> Cc: "efloraofindia" <[email protected]> >> Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2012, 7:15 PM >> >> Neil Sir, >> >> I understand that my species is Sida retusa, not S. rhombifolia. You know >> it much better than me. Please, tell me, of the followings, which one is >> correct - >> >> 1. *Sida retusa = Sida rhombifolia* L. >> 2. *Sida retusa* L. = *Sida alnifolia* var. *alnifolia* >> 3. *Sida retusa* is not connected to any of the above >> >> Thank you & Regards, >> >> surajit >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Neil Soares <[email protected] >> <http://us.mc1601.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> >> You are most welcome Surajit. Sending you some of my more recent >> photographs of Sida retusa. >> With regards, >> Neil Soares. >> >> --- On *Tue, 9/4/12, surajit koley <[email protected] >> <http://us.mc1601.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>>* >> wrote: >> >> >> From: surajit koley <[email protected] >> <http://us.mc1601.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >> > >> Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:128413] Sida rhombifolia L. (?) from Hooghly >> To: "Neil Soares" <[email protected] >> <http://us.mc1601.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>> >> Cc: "efloraofindia" <[email protected] >> <http://us.mc1601.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >> > >> Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2012, 6:29 PM >> >> Neil Sir, >> >> The images of *Sida retusa* (your uploads - >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/wildflowerindia/Y7Lyh4_z5tg/discussion) >> do perfectly match with herbarium found at - >> http://ww2.bgbm.org/herbarium/view_large.cfm?SpecimenPK=151598&idThumb=378002&SpecimenSequenz=1&loan=0 >> >> I thought my pics resemble with the herbarium at - >> http://ww2.bgbm.org/herbarium/view_large.cfm?SpecimenPK=151592&idThumb=377939&SpecimenSequenz=1&loan=0. >> But >> my inexperienced eyes and lack of knowledge are very likely to deceive me. >> >> Thank you very much for the correct id of this Sida. >> >> Regards, >> >> surajit >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Neil Soares <[email protected] >> <http://us.mc1601.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Affirmative. This is Sida retusa. [Don't go by the leaves at the top of >> the plant. Check the leaves lower down]. As Dr.Almeida explained to me when >> I posed the same questions to him - retusa means 'cut' - its as if someone >> has abruptly cut the leaves. Whereas in Sida rhombifolia, the leaves are >> rhomboid. >> With regards, >> Neil Soares. >> >> --- On *Tue, 9/4/12, surajit koley <[email protected] >> <http://us.mc1601.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>>* >> wrote: >> >> >> From: surajit koley <[email protected] >> <http://us.mc1601.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >> > >> Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:128413] Sida rhombifolia L. (?) from Hooghly >> To: "Neil Soares" <[email protected] >> <http://us.mc1601.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>> >> Cc: "efloraofindia" <[email protected] >> <http://us.mc1601.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >> > >> Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2012, 12:07 AM >> >> Neil Sir, >> >> Though my flowers differ with your picture of *S. rhombifolia* at - >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/cWZmjt6gng0/discussion, >> i think my leaves differ with that of your images of *S. retusa* leaves >> at - >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/wildflowerindia/Y7Lyh4_z5tg/discussion. >> >> Besides, the following websites informs *S. retusa = S, rhombifolia* L. >> or *S. rhombifolia* L. subsp. *rhombifolia* - >> >> 1. http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?33900 >> 2. >> >> http://keys.trin.org.au/key-server/data/0e0f0504-0103-430d-8004-060d07080d04/media/Html/taxon/Sida_rhombifolia.htm >> 3. http://www.anbg.gov.au/common.names/ >> >> On the other hand The Plant List informs - >> >> 1. *Sida retusa* L. is a synonym of *Sida alnifolia* var. *alnifolia* >> - http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/tro-19601817 >> 2. more synonyms of the above - >> http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/tro-19603576 >> >> I am confused. Attaching one more photographs, a larger one, for your >> perusal. >> >> Regards, >> >> surajit >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Neil Soares <[email protected] >> <http://us.mc1601.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Negative. This is Sida retusa. Please check these links for my >> photographs and our previous discussion on this : >> >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#!search/Sida$20retusa$20Neil$20Soares/wildflowerindia/Y7Lyh4_z5tg/GuQwons9sIIJ >> >> >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#!search/Sida$20retusa$20Neil$20Soares/indiantreepix/cWZmjt6gng0/oAjbrJq0bCUJ >> >> With regards, >> Neil Soares. >> >> >> --- On *Mon, 9/3/12, surajit koley <[email protected] >> <http://us.mc1601.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>>* >> wrote: >> >> >> From: surajit koley <[email protected] >> <http://us.mc1601.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >> > >> Subject: [efloraofindia:128413] Sida rhombifolia L. (?) from Hooghly >> To: "efloraofindia" <[email protected] >> <http://us.mc1601.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >> > >> Date: Monday, September 3, 2012, 10:54 PM >> >> Sir, >> >> I hope this is *Sida rhombifolia L.*, the Bengali name of which has been >> stated as LAL-BERELA in the book, Plant Groups, by H. Mukherji. >> >> Species : *Sida rhombifolia* L. ? >> Habit & Habitat : wild herb, about 2 feet, found on roadside, pictures >> were taken from two individual plants at the same place >> Date : 01/09/12 & 03/09/12 >> Place : Kamarkundu (Hooghly) >> >> Thank you & Regards, >> >> surajit >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "eFloraofIndia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAMV_mc0HvNa8y8Qp1bJbfctz4i%3DLAHqMzSU0PWmFaJ%2B%2BQ4gYtA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAMV_mc0HvNa8y8Qp1bJbfctz4i%3DLAHqMzSU0PWmFaJ%2B%2BQ4gYtA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAEf%3DytQzAicy9EGp%2BmE6H6xm-x0wo0jjeMGQsYxenkmhU%2BKZYg%40mail.gmail.com.
