Thank you very much Pankaj ... this information was enlightening and
interesting too.
Regards.






On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes Pankaj ji
> I have written about such situations many a times on this group. I hope it
> soon picks up.
>
>
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ <http://people.du.ac.in/%7Esinghg45/>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Dear Dinesh sir,
>>
>> There is one technical issue here. You cant write, "Hibiscus
>> hispidissimus (syn. H. furcatus, H. aculeatus)".
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> Because, the reprint and your link uses some words like "non Willd."
>> and "non Walter". So it means these two names (H. furcatus & H.
>> aculeatus) are being given by Walter and  Willdenow for other taxa and
>> they are being validly used. So your writing this way means you have
>> merged three different species in one, which is not the case here.
>>
>> So now we have three names here. The above plant being:
>>
>> Hibiscus hispidissimus Griff., Not. Pl. Asiat. 4: 521 (1854).
>> Synonyms:
>> Hibiscus aculeatus Roxb., Fl. Ind. 3: 206 (1832) (non Walter 1788) (nom.
>> illeg.)
>> Hibiscus furcatus Roxb. ex DC., Prodr. 1: 448 (1824) (non Willdenow)
>> (nom. illeg.)
>>
>> nom. illeg. means name is illegitimate according to the ICBN's
>> Priority of Publication (Article 11), i.e., wrong, because, there are
>> other two plants accepted with the same two names but given by two
>> different authors. Those names are as follows:
>>
>> Hibiscus furcatus Willd., Enum. Pl. [Willdenow] 2: 736 (1809).
>>
>> Hibiscus aculeatus Walter, Fl. Carol. [Walter] 177 (1788).
>>
>> So the solution:
>>
>> If you dont wish to write the original citation like most of the
>> taxonomists do, then, in the simplest way it can be written as:
>>
>> Hibiscus hispidissimus [syn. H. furcatus (not the originally
>> described), H. aculeatus (not the originally described)].
>>
>> or
>>
>> Hibiscus hispidissimus [syn. H. furcatus (non Willdenow), H. aculeatus
>> (non Walter)]
>>
>> Hope this is understandable.
>>
>> Regards
>> Pankaj
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ***********************************************
>> "TAXONOMISTS GETTING EXTINCT AND SPECIES DATA DEFICIENT !!"
>>
>>
>> Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae)
>> Research Associate
>> Greater Kailash Sacred Landscape Project
>> Department of Habitat Ecology
>> Wildlife Institute of India
>> Post Box # 18
>> Dehradun - 248001, India
>>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to