It seems to be Sida acuta, but the growth pattern shows little difference.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Smita Raskar <[email protected]>wrote:

> Sida Acuta
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> For me also Sida acuta
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>> Retired  Associate Professor
>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Resurfacing again for ID
>>>
>>> Earlier feedback
>>>
>>> Sheetal ji....................................................Sida acuta
>>>
>>> Nidhan ji.....................................................Sida acuta
>>> cannot be ruled out, but I guess this can be Malvastrum
>>> tricuspidatum.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:36 PM
>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:59268] Request for ID : 050111 : AK-1
>>> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>> Taken near Anjaneri, Nasik, Maharashtra on the 27th of Sept,2010 growing
>>> wild.
>>> Aarti
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Smita raskar
> 308 Disha Residency,
> Salaiwada,Sawantwadi
> Mob.9763989639
>
>


-- 
Dr. Satish Kumar Chile

Reply via email to