Hi Prof. Singh,
  Sought a clarification from Dr. Almeida. His take on this:
 
-         Most of the Physalis species found in India are not indigenous but 
introduced from the Americas.
-         Linnaeus described Physalis minima and hence a type specimen must 
exist.
-         The nomenclature of Indian species is rather ambiguous - specimens 
initially described [possibly even in Cooke’s Flora] as P. minima had large 
flowers and would therefore now be labelled P.angulata.
-         P.minima [with tiny flowers] does exist and has been recorded by Dr. 
Almeida in a few places including the Borivali N.P., Bombay.
 
My plants have large flowers and would therefore be P.angulata.
  
                                           Regards,
                                             Neil Soares.

--- On Wed, 4/6/11, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:66439] Solnacaea week:Physalis minima
To: "Neil Soares" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Smita Raskar" <[email protected]>, "manudev madhavan" 
<[email protected]>, "Vijayasankar Raman" <[email protected]>, 
"indiantreepix" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, April 6, 2011, 10:18 PM


Neil ji
Perhaps you did not get my point. P. minima L. is no longer a valid name and as 
such can't be used for any species, in the same way as we can't call any 
species as Solanum indicum. The plants hitherto known as Physalis minima L. are 
as such correctly P. angulata L.


http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/tro-29604078



-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ 




On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Neil Soares <[email protected]> wrote:






Hi,
 Thank you Prof. Singh for your feedback.
 
 Dr. Almeida in his 'Flora of Maharashtra' Vol 3-B lists Physalis angulata & 
Physalis minima as distinct species.
 Furthermore, he states that though P.angulata has been recorded from a few 
places in Maharashtra, it is a native of the West Indies.
 
 Will therefore have to stick with my plants being Physalis mininma.
                           Regards,
                            Neil Soares.


--- On Wed, 4/6/11, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:



From: Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:66439] Solnacaea week:Physalis minima
To: "Neil Soares" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Smita Raskar" <[email protected]>, "manudev madhavan" 
<[email protected]>, "Vijayasankar Raman" <[email protected]>, 
"indiantreepix" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, April 6, 2011, 5:46 PM





I think the same Physalis angulata, since P. minima L. is no longer an accepted 
name 


http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/tro-29600210



-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ 

 


On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Neil Soares <[email protected]> wrote:






Hi,
  These are mine. Taken on my property in August 2010. Presume they 
are Physalis minima.
                         With regards,
                           Neil Soares.

--- On Tue, 4/5/11, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:66439] Solnacaea week:Physalis minima
To: "Smita Raskar" <[email protected]>
Cc: "manudev madhavan" <[email protected]>, "Vijayasankar Raman" 
<[email protected]>, "indiantreepix" <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2011, 6:58 PM 





Yes looks like P. angulata 
Here is mine from Delhi



-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ 


On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Smita Raskar <[email protected]> wrote:

Yeah Key is useful but then i must be wrong in id of my plant,i think picture i 
hv posted should be Physalis angulata according to this key..is it...plz help i 
am confused :( 





On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

Thanks Smita ji for useful information. This should really help in 
understanding our photographs. 




-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ 





On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Smita Raskar <[email protected]> wrote:


http://www.plantsystematics.com/qikan/manage/wenzhang/aps06141.pdf....refer  
this link it gives details of species Physalis 
It says (vi) Nicolson et al. (1988) reduced P. minima L. as a synonym of P. 
angulata L.  
There is a need to typify  Physalis minima L. However, Edmonds (personal 
communication) opines that the typification of the Linnaean P. minima is 
complex, with the 
lectotype (Hort. Cliff. no. 62, Physalis 5) being conspecific to  P. angulata. 
Therefore, she 
considers it as a synonym of the latter in her forthcoming account of 
Solanaceae in Flora of 
Tropical East Africa. Most of the descriptions and plates on which Linnaeus 
based his species 
also refer to P. angulata rather than to the small-flowered prostrate plant, 
usually known as 
“P. minima” (that we treat here as Physalis lagascae). 
Conversely, in the Indian taxonomic literature, we are dealing with two 
distinct elements 
(Table 1) under the name P. minima: First  one is an erect, robust, smooth, 
tetraploid taxon 
with bigger flowers (>7 mm across), bluish anthers, and fruiting calyces tinged 
purple   No. 2 RAJU et al.:The myth of “minima” and “maxima”, the species of 
Physalis 241
(P. angulata). The second one is a diffuse to erect, relatively smaller, 
pubescent, diploid taxon 
with smaller (<6 mm across) flowers (parviflora or micrantha), yellow anthers, 
and greenish 
fruiting calyces (P. lagascae). 



On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

Vijayasankar ji 
Please help with the key of Indian species of P. minima complex



-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/  





On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:24 PM, manudev madhavan <[email protected]> 
wrote:

Dear all,  


Can anybody tell how to differentiate P. minima from P. angulata??


regards





r <[email protected]> wrote: 


Hello 
Physalis minima found at Sawantwadi, Maharashtra
-- 
Smita raskar 


308 Disha Residency,
Salaiwada,Sawantwadi 
Mob.09422379568



-- 

Manudev K Madhavan
Junior Research Fellow
Systematic & Floristic Lab,
Department of Botany, 
Centre for Postgraduate Studies & Research 
St. Joseph's College, Devagiri
Kozhikode- 673 008
Mob: 9496470738






-- 
Smita raskar 


308 Disha Residency,
Salaiwada,Sawantwadi 
Mob.09422379568






-- 
Smita raskar 


308 Disha Residency,
Salaiwada,Sawantwadi 
Mob.09422379568



-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ 







Reply via email to