Sorry, two different persons named the last one with a single species
name and a third person made a new combination.
One name is based on other.
As usual, I am poor in mathematics...
Thanks a lot Madhuri mam and Prashant sir for your comments..
Pankaj


On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks a lot Dinesh sir. In the last case, most interesting thing is,
> three differentpersons at three different places, used the same
> species name for theirplants in the same year, which eventually
> referred to same taxa. There has to be somethign DEAR about DEARE on
> which the name is based!!! May be the plant to which all referred to
> was collected by some Mr. Dear!!
> Enjoy.
> Pankaj
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Many thanks Pankaj ... very useful information.
>> Regards.
>> Dinesh
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> While working on the Revision of Bulbophyllums of Asia, I am
>>> encountering many Orchid names which are tricky. So I just wished to
>>> share some information, why we should be careful while attaching
>>> proper names to the plants. Its very technical and may not be interest
>>> of all, but please bear with me.
>>> Here are few strange examples:
>>>
>>> A.
>>> Bulbophyllum careyanum (Hook.) Spreng., Syst. Veg. 3: 732 (1826).
>>> Bulbophyllum carrianum J.J.Verm., Gard. Bull. Singapore 52: 279 (2000).
>>>
>>> Both of the above examples are of accepted names of two different
>>> plants, but they are pronounced similarly though they have variation
>>> in spelling and etymology.
>>>
>>> B.
>>> Bulbophyllum klossii Ridl., Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Bot. 9: 179 (1916).
>>> Bulbophyllum klossii Ridl., Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew 1926: 85 (1926), nom.
>>> illeg.
>>>
>>> Both of the names are unaccepted. Second name is invalid as the first
>>> name already existed. These name dont refer to the same plant because
>>> first plant is actually synonyms of Bulbophyllum trachyanthum
>>> Kraenzl., Oesterr. Bot. Z. 44: 336 (1894), where as second one refers
>>> to Bulbophyllum purpurascens Teijsm. & Binn., Natuurk. Tijdschr.
>>> Ned.-Indië 24: 308 (1862).
>>>
>>> C.
>>> Bulbophyllum ciliatum (Blume) Lindl., Gen. Sp. Orchid. Pl.: 48 (1830).
>>> Bulbophyllum ciliolatum Schltr., Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. Beih.
>>> 1: 809 (1913).
>>>
>>> Both the above names are accepted and they are distinct taxa and
>>> missing one 'o' means a wrong identity!!
>>>
>>> D.
>>> Bulbophyllum cochleatum Lindl., J. Proc. Linn. Soc., Bot. 6: 125 (1862).
>>> Bulbophyllum cochleatum Schltr., Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 8: 455
>>> (1910), nom. illeg.
>>>
>>> First is an accepted name and second is invalid as first exists but
>>> second refers to another plant, Bulbophyllum macphersonii var.
>>> spathulatum Dockrill & St.Cloud, N. Queensland Naturalist 26(117): 4
>>> (1957).
>>>
>>> E.
>>> Bulbophyllum dearei (Rchb.f.) Rchb.f., Flora 71: 156 (1888).
>>> Bulbophyllum dearei A.H.Kent in H.J.Veitch, Man. Orchid. Pl. 3: 95
>>> (1888), nom. illeg.
>>>
>>> Both names were published in 1888 but one was a bit early so first is
>>> accept and second is illegitimate. But the interesting thing is,
>>> second is synonym of first. Second interesting thing is the basionym
>>> of first was also published in 1888, Sarcopodium dearei Rchb.f., Flora
>>> 71: 156 (1888).!!!
>>>
>>> Enjoy the twists and turns....
>>> Pankaj
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> **********************************************************************
>>> "Taxonomists getting Extinct and Species Data Deficient !!"
>>>
>>>
>>> Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae)
>>> Conservation Officer
>>>
>>> Office:
>>> Flora Conservation Department
>>> Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (KFBG) Corporation
>>> Lam Kam Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong.
>>>
>>> Residence:
>>> 36c, Ng Tung Chai, Lam Tseun
>>> Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong.
>>>
>>> email: [email protected]
>>>           [email protected]
>>>           [email protected]
>>> Phone: +852 2483 7128 (office - 8:30am to 5:30pm)
>>>            +852 9436 6251 (mobile)
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> **********************************************************************
> "Taxonomists getting Extinct and Species Data Deficient !!"
>
>
> Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae)
> Conservation Officer
>
> Office:
> Flora Conservation Department
> Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (KFBG) Corporation
> Lam Kam Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong.
>
> Residence:
> 36c, Ng Tung Chai, Lam Tseun
> Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong.
>
> email: [email protected]
>           [email protected]
>           [email protected]
> Phone: +852 2483 7128 (office - 8:30am to 5:30pm)
>            +852 9436 6251 (mobile)



-- 
**********************************************************************
"Taxonomists getting Extinct and Species Data Deficient !!"


Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae)
Conservation Officer

Office:
Flora Conservation Department
Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (KFBG) Corporation
Lam Kam Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong.

Residence:
36c, Ng Tung Chai, Lam Tseun
Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong.

email: [email protected]
          [email protected]
          [email protected]
Phone: +852 2483 7128 (office - 8:30am to 5:30pm)
           +852 9436 6251 (mobile)

Reply via email to