Yes sir, that was the twist. Its by same author in different publication.... :)
Pankaj


On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Pankaj ji for these interesting examples
>
> Had known examples of homonyms involving different authors, but this one is
> interesting
>
> Bulbophyllum klossii Ridl., Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Bot. 9: 179 (1916).
> Bulbophyllum klossii Ridl., Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew 1926: 85 (1926), nom.
> illeg.
>
> How could Ridley give same name to two different plants
>
>
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, two different persons named the last one with a single species
>> name and a third person made a new combination.
>> One name is based on other.
>> As usual, I am poor in mathematics...
>> Thanks a lot Madhuri mam and Prashant sir for your comments..
>> Pankaj
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks a lot Dinesh sir. In the last case, most interesting thing is,
>> > three differentpersons at three different places, used the same
>> > species name for theirplants in the same year, which eventually
>> > referred to same taxa. There has to be somethign DEAR about DEARE on
>> > which the name is based!!! May be the plant to which all referred to
>> > was collected by some Mr. Dear!!
>> > Enjoy.
>> > Pankaj
>> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Many thanks Pankaj ... very useful information.
>> >> Regards.
>> >> Dinesh
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> While working on the Revision of Bulbophyllums of Asia, I am
>> >>> encountering many Orchid names which are tricky. So I just wished to
>> >>> share some information, why we should be careful while attaching
>> >>> proper names to the plants. Its very technical and may not be interest
>> >>> of all, but please bear with me.
>> >>> Here are few strange examples:
>> >>>
>> >>> A.
>> >>> Bulbophyllum careyanum (Hook.) Spreng., Syst. Veg. 3: 732 (1826).
>> >>> Bulbophyllum carrianum J.J.Verm., Gard. Bull. Singapore 52: 279
>> >>> (2000).
>> >>>
>> >>> Both of the above examples are of accepted names of two different
>> >>> plants, but they are pronounced similarly though they have variation
>> >>> in spelling and etymology.
>> >>>
>> >>> B.
>> >>> Bulbophyllum klossii Ridl., Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Bot. 9: 179
>> >>> (1916).
>> >>> Bulbophyllum klossii Ridl., Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew 1926: 85 (1926),
>> >>> nom.
>> >>> illeg.
>> >>>
>> >>> Both of the names are unaccepted. Second name is invalid as the first
>> >>> name already existed. These name dont refer to the same plant because
>> >>> first plant is actually synonyms of Bulbophyllum trachyanthum
>> >>> Kraenzl., Oesterr. Bot. Z. 44: 336 (1894), where as second one refers
>> >>> to Bulbophyllum purpurascens Teijsm. & Binn., Natuurk. Tijdschr.
>> >>> Ned.-Indië 24: 308 (1862).
>> >>>
>> >>> C.
>> >>> Bulbophyllum ciliatum (Blume) Lindl., Gen. Sp. Orchid. Pl.: 48 (1830).
>> >>> Bulbophyllum ciliolatum Schltr., Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. Beih.
>> >>> 1: 809 (1913).
>> >>>
>> >>> Both the above names are accepted and they are distinct taxa and
>> >>> missing one 'o' means a wrong identity!!
>> >>>
>> >>> D.
>> >>> Bulbophyllum cochleatum Lindl., J. Proc. Linn. Soc., Bot. 6: 125
>> >>> (1862).
>> >>> Bulbophyllum cochleatum Schltr., Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 8: 455
>> >>> (1910), nom. illeg.
>> >>>
>> >>> First is an accepted name and second is invalid as first exists but
>> >>> second refers to another plant, Bulbophyllum macphersonii var.
>> >>> spathulatum Dockrill & St.Cloud, N. Queensland Naturalist 26(117): 4
>> >>> (1957).
>> >>>
>> >>> E.
>> >>> Bulbophyllum dearei (Rchb.f.) Rchb.f., Flora 71: 156 (1888).
>> >>> Bulbophyllum dearei A.H.Kent in H.J.Veitch, Man. Orchid. Pl. 3: 95
>> >>> (1888), nom. illeg.
>> >>>
>> >>> Both names were published in 1888 but one was a bit early so first is
>> >>> accept and second is illegitimate. But the interesting thing is,
>> >>> second is synonym of first. Second interesting thing is the basionym
>> >>> of first was also published in 1888, Sarcopodium dearei Rchb.f., Flora
>> >>> 71: 156 (1888).!!!
>> >>>
>> >>> Enjoy the twists and turns....
>> >>> Pankaj
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> **********************************************************************
>> >>> "Taxonomists getting Extinct and Species Data Deficient !!"
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae)
>> >>> Conservation Officer
>> >>>
>> >>> Office:
>> >>> Flora Conservation Department
>> >>> Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (KFBG) Corporation
>> >>> Lam Kam Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong.
>> >>>
>> >>> Residence:
>> >>> 36c, Ng Tung Chai, Lam Tseun
>> >>> Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong.
>> >>>
>> >>> email: [email protected]
>> >>>           [email protected]
>> >>>           [email protected]
>> >>> Phone: +852 2483 7128 (office - 8:30am to 5:30pm)
>> >>>            +852 9436 6251 (mobile)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > **********************************************************************
>> > "Taxonomists getting Extinct and Species Data Deficient !!"
>> >
>> >
>> > Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae)
>> > Conservation Officer
>> >
>> > Office:
>> > Flora Conservation Department
>> > Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (KFBG) Corporation
>> > Lam Kam Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong.
>> >
>> > Residence:
>> > 36c, Ng Tung Chai, Lam Tseun
>> > Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong.
>> >
>> > email: [email protected]
>> >           [email protected]
>> >           [email protected]
>> > Phone: +852 2483 7128 (office - 8:30am to 5:30pm)
>> >            +852 9436 6251 (mobile)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> **********************************************************************
>> "Taxonomists getting Extinct and Species Data Deficient !!"
>>
>>
>> Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae)
>> Conservation Officer
>>
>> Office:
>> Flora Conservation Department
>> Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (KFBG) Corporation
>> Lam Kam Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong.
>>
>> Residence:
>> 36c, Ng Tung Chai, Lam Tseun
>> Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong.
>>
>> email: [email protected]
>>           [email protected]
>>           [email protected]
>> Phone: +852 2483 7128 (office - 8:30am to 5:30pm)
>>            +852 9436 6251 (mobile)
>
>
>
>



-- 
**********************************************************************
"Taxonomists getting Extinct and Species Data Deficient !!"


Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae)
Conservation Officer

Office:
Flora Conservation Department
Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (KFBG) Corporation
Lam Kam Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong.

Residence:
36c, Ng Tung Chai, Lam Tseun
Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong.

email: [email protected]
          [email protected]
          [email protected]
Phone: +852 2483 7128 (office - 8:30am to 5:30pm)
           +852 9436 6251 (mobile)

Reply via email to