I meant the plants are physically different but have the same name On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Bhagyashri <[email protected]> wrote:
> I had actually posted these two as 2 separate threads. I do not know how > they got clubbed. > Fortunately they belong to the same plant > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Bhagyashri Ranade (Google Docs) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I've shared [efloraofindia: 11032012MR2] Convolvulaceae Week: Ipomoea >> cairica from >> Pune<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CS8aOKkqLrhD04T2f0ab_Ji9qiU7PWVxPgIQo2oPYZI/edit> >> Click to open: >> >> - [efloraofindia: 11032012MR2] Convolvulaceae Week: Ipomoea cairica >> from >> Pune<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CS8aOKkqLrhD04T2f0ab_Ji9qiU7PWVxPgIQo2oPYZI/edit> >> >> >> Sharing images of Ipomoea cairica growing wild at Pune >> >> Photographed in Oct 2011 >> >> Ref my previous post efloraofindia:''For Id 09102011MR3’’ ?Ipomoea >> cairica flowers Pune >> >> identification credit Hari lal ji >> >> Regards >> >> Bhagyashri >> >> >> Google Docs makes it easy to create, store and share online documents, >> spreadsheets and presentations. >> [image: Logo for Google Docs] <https://docs.google.com> >> > > > > -- > Regards > Bhagyashri > -- Regards Bhagyashri
