Samir Ji, Just now it comes to my notice that i made a big mistake in my earlier reply. The plant in my post looks more like *Hippeastrum roseum* than *H. puniceum*.
Thank you & Regards, Surajit Koley On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:47 PM, surajit koley < [email protected]> wrote: > Thank you Samir Ji for the ID suggestion, but it looks more like *Hippeastrum > puniceum* as have been suggested by Ganesh Ji in another post at - > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw > > Regards, > > Surajit Koley > > > On Monday, 14 May 2012 20:20:04 UTC+5:30, Samir Mehta wrote: >> >> Please check Hippeastrum puniceum. >> >> Regards, >> >> Samir Mehta >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, May 8, 2012 12:59:45 PM UTC+5:30, surajit koley wrote: >>> >>> Sir / Madam, >>> >>> Attaching some photographs that i have recorded a couple of hours ago. >>> Please read it along with my earlier post at - >>> https://groups.google.com/**forum/?fromgroups#!topic/** >>> indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw<https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#%21topic/indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw> >>> . >>> >>> Species : UNKNOWN >>> Habit & Habitat : wild herb, uncultivated area in mango orchard >>> Date : 08-05-12, 09.04 a.m. >>> Place : Nalikul (Hooghly), WB >>> >>> I have noted the following differences between the two species - >>> >>> 1) Marked difference in anther size and colour : this species has >>> smaller anther and pollens are yellow >>> 2) Difference in scape height : the height os the scape of this one is >>> about 60 cm, while the scape is more than 70 cm in >>> https://groups.google.com/**forum/?fromgroups#!topic/** >>> indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw<https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#%21topic/indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw> >>> 3) No differences in flower size or scape diameter >>> 4) No visible difference in colour >>> >>> Thank you & Regards, >>> >>> Surajit Koley >>> >>
