Thank You Surajit ji.

Regards,

Samir Mehta



On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:43 PM, surajit koley <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Samir Ji,
>
> Just now it comes to my notice that i made a big mistake in my earlier
> reply. The plant in my post looks more like *Hippeastrum roseum* than *H.
> puniceum*.
>
> Thank you & Regards,
>
> Surajit Koley
>
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:47 PM, surajit koley <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Samir Ji for the ID suggestion, but it looks more like *Hippeastrum
>> puniceum* as have been suggested by Ganesh Ji in another post at -
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Surajit Koley
>>
>>
>> On Monday, 14 May 2012 20:20:04 UTC+5:30, Samir Mehta wrote:
>>>
>>> Please check Hippeastrum puniceum.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Samir Mehta
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, May 8, 2012 12:59:45 PM UTC+5:30, surajit koley wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sir / Madam,
>>>>
>>>> Attaching some photographs that i have recorded a couple of hours ago.
>>>> Please read it along with my earlier post at -
>>>> https://groups.google.com/**forum/?fromgroups#!topic/**
>>>> indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw<https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#%21topic/indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> Species : UNKNOWN
>>>> Habit & Habitat : wild herb, uncultivated area in mango orchard
>>>> Date : 08-05-12, 09.04 a.m.
>>>> Place : Nalikul (Hooghly), WB
>>>>
>>>> I have noted the following differences between the two species -
>>>>
>>>> 1) Marked difference in anther size and colour : this species has
>>>> smaller anther and pollens are yellow
>>>> 2) Difference in scape height : the height os the scape of this one is
>>>> about 60 cm, while the scape is more than 70 cm in
>>>> https://groups.google.com/**forum/?fromgroups#!topic/**
>>>> indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw<https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#%21topic/indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw>
>>>> 3) No differences in flower size or scape diameter
>>>> 4) No visible difference in colour
>>>>
>>>> Thank you & Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Surajit Koley
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to