Thank you very much Sir for the correct name of this tree.

With regards,

surajit


On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Neil Soares <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
>  This is the Sacred Barna [Crataeva tapia Linn.]. The local name is
> Vavarun.
>               With regards,
>                 Neil Soares.
>
> --- On *Tue, 8/28/12, surajit koley <[email protected]>*wrote:
>
>
> From: surajit koley <[email protected]>
> Subject: [efloraofindia:127029] Crateva religiosa from Hooghly
> To: "efloraofindia" <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, August 28, 2012, 10:01 PM
>
> Sir,
>
> My colleague. Ms Arpita Ram recorded these photogrpahs yesterday, near
> Konnagarh (Hooghly), roadside. Is this *Crataeva religiosa Forst.*, and
> the Bengali name given to it BARUN ?
>
> *Crateva = Crataeva* !!!
>
> "This species was in 1786 with the notation *Crataeva* by Johann Georg
> Adam Forster in *Dissertatio ... De Plantis Esculentis Insularum Oceani
> Australis* , pp. 45-46 and in the same year *. Fl Ins.Austr* , page 35
> published with a brief description. The spelling *Crateva religiosa* is
> valid." <http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crateva_religiosa#Systematik>
>
> *Crateva religiosa Forst.? or Crateva religiosa Forst. f.? or Crateva
> religiosa G.Forst.?*
>
> Wikipedia says = "The flowering tree *Crateva religiosa* (syn *Crataeva
> religiosa*, *Crateva adansonii*) is called the *sacred garlic pear* and 
> *temple
> plant........"* <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crateva_religiosa> and the
> Latin name given to it is *Crateva religiosa* *Forst. 
> f.<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Forster>
> *
>
>
>    - (According to a text book, "Plant Groups", by H. Mukherji) *Crataeva
>    religiosa Forst. = C. nurvala Buch. -Ham.* = BARUN (Bengali)
>    - The Plant List = *Crateva religiosa 
> G.Forst.<http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-2742384>
>    *
>    - GRIN = *Crateva religiosa G. 
> Forst.<http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?12158>
>    *
>    - while wikipedia mentions *C. religiosa** = **C. adansonii*, Flora of
>    Pakistan doesn't mention *C. religiosa* =
>    http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=250063253
>    - to know what The plant list says about *C. adansonii*, please click
>    the link - http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-2742336
>    - Flora of China does feature *C. religiosa* -
>    http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200009175
>    - another description of *C. religiosa* -
>    http://apps.kew.org/efloras/namedetail.do?flora=fz&taxon=471&nameid=1354
>    **
>    - Please see the synonyms of *Crateva nurvala** Buch. -Ham* at The
>    Plant List http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-2742376 and at
>    the GRIN http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?429700
>
>
> Images at the net -
>
>    1. http://www.flickr.com/photos/20353348@N00/130200139/
>    2. http://www.flickr.com/photos/47512780@N05/4492725461/
>    3. Fruits of *Crateva religiosa* at
>    
> http://www.pestnet.org/SummariesofMessages/NonPests/PlantID/Crataevareligiosa,identification,FSM.aspx
>  and
>    at
>    
> http://keys.trin.org.au/key-server/data/0e0f0504-0103-430d-8004-060d07080d04/media/Html/taxon/Crateva_religiosa.htm
>  do
>    not match with *C. nurvala* -
>    https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/DzTtnnalFZg/discussion
>
> Indian Council of Medical Research = *Crataeva religiosa Forst.* -
> http://www.icmr.nic.in/pinstitute/belgaum/Museum/Museum%20Herbarium%20Text1%20Updated/Dry%20Drug.pdf
>
> So, the species in this post =
>
>    - *C. religiosa* Forst ?
>    - *C. religiosa* Forst. f. ?
>    - *C. religiosa* G. Forst ?
>    - *C. nurvala* Buch. -Ham. ?
>
> Thank you & Regards,
>
> surajit
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>

-- 



Reply via email to