Many thanks Gurcharan ji, Shrikant ji, Pankaj and Manoj ji ... your
thoughts and perspectives are very interesting reading, it threw lot of
light to what I could not see.
Regards.
Dinesh


On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:41 PM, manoj chandran <[email protected]>wrote:

> Most of the muleteers are from Moradabad, Najibabad, etc and the total
> number of mules during the season exceeds 10000. Chopper services can only
> take the pilgrims till Ghanghariya. Choppers cannot fly to Hemkund as
> Hemkund is most of the time under fog and cloud. If somebody opts for a
> mule ride, then he will have to spend atleast Rs.4000 plus spend atleast
> two days rent and also food charges. So, taking a chopper would not be that
> additional an expense and also will save time. The major protest is from
> muleteers and shopkeepers who think their business will fall. However,
> there will always be pilgrims who prefer to walk to reach the shrine rather
> than take a ride in a mule or helicopter. More chopper services would also
> increase competition and the prices may also come down. The chopper takes
> only 6 minutes to Ghangharia. Saving three days would also mean saving
> three days of garbage. However, choppers and ropeways cannot cater to all
> pilgrims, even those who do not wish to walk, because the total number of
> pilgrims is too high. So, a ropeway will only be an additional facility and
> will in no way reduce the impacts of tourism. Rather, more pilgrims would
> be attracted due to the facility, who otherwise would not have ventured to
> visit the shrine, which they believe is a life time achievement. The flora
> of Hemkund Sahib has been the same from a long time ago, and the pilgrimage
> also is very old. Collection of Brahma Kamal is also an age old practice.
> These plants are perennial and propagates more by vegetative means than
> from seeds. Also, they grow in very gregarious populations and it is not
> possible to collect all the flowers. The additional facilities will cater
> to decrease the impact of increase in number of pilgrims. The major issue
> is garbage and mule dung. Mule dung is very 'hot' and as such will burn the
> vegetation. It can even dry the trees. So, mule dung will have to be first
> treated or composted and then returned to the soil. Even then, excess
> nutrition will have impact on local flora and will promote more weed flora.
> Regarding garbage collection and cleaning by the EDCs and pilgrim
> volunteers, it is just a redistribution of garbage from the walkways to
> other places. The so called collection and recycling of polythene garbage
> at Rishikesh takes place only once in a while. More dangerous is the
> developement activities at Ghangharia. Most of the hoteliers are
> constructing their upper stories in cement. There are also departmental
> constructions taking place using cement and stone. The Sikh Regiment is
> concreting the walkway at Ghanghariya. These have resulted in choking of
> the root system and hence drying of the Abies spectabilis trees all along
> the path at Ghanghariya. And all this happening in a Reserved Forest area.
> If the forest department or anybody say anything against all these, they
> are just treated as 'anti-development', 'pseudo-environmentalists', etc.
> There is no support from the pilgrim community. There are some volunteers
> who clean the walkways, but these volunteers are just a few compared to the
> large amount of environmentally-unfriendly tourists. We cannot stop the
> pilgrimage as it is a matter of religion and faith. We can only educate the
> pilgrims to be eco-friendly. Nature has helped by restricting tourism to
> only six months in a year and also thanks to landslides enroute which makes
> the journey even tougher. Some pilgrims even walk from Rishikesh till
> Hemkund Sahib. May pilgrims want to do the trek on foot, but they are not
> able to do so because of physical reasons, but they also have the full
> right to visit their shrine of faith. Going uphill on a rope way to  such
> great altitudes defiinitely has problems of high altitude sickness, but if
> they stay only for an hour or so and immediately return after darshan to
> Govindghat, then it would be fine.
> So, in short let us be clear that tourism/pilgrimage is not going to stop
> and neither can be restricted. So, let us try to make it more eco-friendly
> and give more facilities to the pilgrims to help them make their trip
> impact-free. May be we have to sacrifice some land and flora so that the
> remaining area is left unaffected. Let us hope that the ropeway and chopper
> services will help in this endeavour.
> But I see that no one has spoken about the greater trouble- the dam
> proposed and under construction in Bhyundar valley.
> You all may ask that I am a forest officer and along with other forest
> officers still not able to do anything?!! Let me inform you that any forest
> officer is just a small servant of the public. He/she can only advice the
> public on the pros and cons, but it is the public who has to take a
> decision. Just give your support to the forest guard and see the difference
> he can make. In spite of all pressures and criticisms, they try to perform
> and do their best for the benefit of nature and in turn humanity.  But the
> reality is that the public alienates the forest department and its staff
> thinking that they have come from a different world to harass the public.
> Somebody could volunteer to conduct a survey and find out who the real
> beneficiaries of the pilgrimage are - the pilgrims, tour operators,
> villagers, muleteers and shopkeepers from outside the state, contractors
> benefitting from the construction, politicians, shrine authorities,
> government departments, NGOs, etc? Whoever is the beneficiary there is only
> one entity which do not benefit rather suffer from these activities- that
> is biodiversity and the environment, what we call 'NATURE minus the
> destructive man'.
>
> On Thursday, October 18, 2012 3:49:11 PM UTC+5:30, Rajesh Sachdev wrote:
>
>> Centre approves Hemkunt Sahib ropeway project
>>
>> *CHANDIGARH:* For convenience of the pilgrims, the Centre government has
>> given its approval for ropeway from Gurdwara Gobind Dham to Hemkunt Sahib.
>> The project will cost around Rs 75 crore and expected to finish in 2014
>> before the commencement of Hemkunt Sahib yatra in summers.
>>
>> In the first phase of the project, the ropeway will be operational till
>> Gurdwara Gobind Dham which will be later extended to Gobind Ghat. At
>> present, the pilgrims can also commute from Gobind Ghat to Gobind Dham
>> through chopper services which cost Rs 3,500 per person.
>>
>> Hemkunt Sahib is one of the most revered places in Sikhism where tenth
>> Sikh guru, Guru Gobind Singh meditated before his incarnation as the Sikh
>> guru. Every year, the doors of Hemkunt Sahib open for the Sikh pilgrims on
>> June 1 who can visit till October 5.
>>
>> Later, the Gurdwara is kept closed during the winters as the
>> environmental conditions are not suitable for human visit and survival as
>> the gurdwara is located at an altitude of 4,632.96 metres (15,200.0 ft).
>>
>> http://www.punjabnewsline.com/**news/Centre-approves-Hemkunt-**
>> Sahib-ropeway-project-.html<http://www.punjabnewsline.com/news/Centre-approves-Hemkunt-Sahib-ropeway-project-.html>
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>> Rajesh Sachdev
>> https://www.facebook.com/**leopardguy<https://www.facebook.com/leopardguy>
>> https://www.facebook.com/**groups/indianflora/<https://www.facebook.com/groups/indianflora/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>
>
>
>

-- 



Reply via email to