On 02/07/2012 10:25 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > On 7 February 2012 15:21, Scott Marlow<[email protected]> wrote: >> On 02/07/2012 10:07 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >>>>> I'm not that worried about OGM (unless someone wants double buffering >>>>> ;), its more about users wanting to package in different versions in >>>>> Hibernate (newer/older). >>> Even if someone wanted double buffering, OGM was already upgraded to >>> use Hibernate 4, so this doesn't apply. >>> >>> >> >> I think it depends on whether OGM will always work with the Hibernate >> 4.x version that is used in AS 7.x. If OGM moves forward (Hibernate >> version wise) and starts requiring a different version than the one that >> is static wired into the Infinispan module, the user might want multiple >> Hibernate 4.x versions to be wired into the Infinispan module. I'm not >> sure but if Infinispan has multiple versions of Hibernate in its >> classpath, that probably would interfere with the custom commands (I >> would think). > > Good point. It's unlikely for OGM to need a 2nd level cache, but this > reasoning applies to Hibernate Search as well, for which we often > depend on a newer version of Core than what is provided by the AS.
How hard would it be to allow a different way of passing the custom commands in? Would this be a short term change in the next few weeks or longer term? > > --Sanne > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
