On 8 Feb 2012, at 10:27, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > On 8 February 2012 04:14, Scott Marlow <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 02/07/2012 10:25 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >>> >>> On 7 February 2012 15:21, Scott Marlow<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/07/2012 10:07 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not that worried about OGM (unless someone wants double buffering >>>>>>> ;), its more about users wanting to package in different versions in >>>>>>> Hibernate (newer/older). >>>>> >>>>> Even if someone wanted double buffering, OGM was already upgraded to >>>>> use Hibernate 4, so this doesn't apply. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> I think it depends on whether OGM will always work with the Hibernate >>>> 4.x version that is used in AS 7.x. If OGM moves forward (Hibernate >>>> version wise) and starts requiring a different version than the one that >>>> is static wired into the Infinispan module, the user might want multiple >>>> Hibernate 4.x versions to be wired into the Infinispan module. I'm not >>>> sure but if Infinispan has multiple versions of Hibernate in its >>>> classpath, that probably would interfere with the custom commands (I >>>> would think). >>> >>> >>> Good point. It's unlikely for OGM to need a 2nd level cache, but this >>> reasoning applies to Hibernate Search as well, for which we often >>> depend on a newer version of Core than what is provided by the AS. >> >> >> How hard would it be to allow a different way of passing the custom commands >> in? Would this be a short term change in the next few weeks or longer term? > > Sorry I'm not sure I understood what you are proposing. How do you > suggest it should work? > --Sanne
Yes, please do elaborate… -- Manik Surtani [email protected] twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
