Ok, I've created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3022
In fact, we should also re-implement the BoundedConcurrentHashMap - the basis for LIRS and LRU eviction algorithms - to use techniques similar to CHMv8 rather than the old segment-based approach. https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3023 Anyone has a few spare cycles - and is really good with complex concurrency code - want to take this on? ;) - M On 19 Apr 2013, at 09:06, Manik Surtani <msurt...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 19 Apr 2013, at 05:07, Sanne Grinovero <sa...@infinispan.org> wrote: > >> Why not. Only doubt I'd have is that other usages of the CHM are - I guess - >> services registry and similar configuration tools, for which write >> performance is irrelevant: your test measured puts, are there drawbacks on >> gets or memory usage? >> > See the original announcement on concurrency-interest by Doug Lea, and the > subsequent comments. The design is up here too. One of the goals was to > drastically reduce memory usage with CHMv8. > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jsr.166-concurrency/8140 > > Interestingly, Netty uses a backported CHMv8 as well - apparently inspired by > our inclusion of it in Infinispan. ;) > > https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/1052 > > -M > > -- > Manik Surtani > ma...@jboss.org > twitter.com/maniksurtani > > Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid > http://red.ht/data-grid > -- Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid http://red.ht/data-grid _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
