On May 2, 2013, at 7:01 PM, Pedro Ruivo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> When recovery is enabled, the recovery manager creates a second cache. >>> Someone may want to replace the Clock/TimeService for the "normal" cache >>> and left the default implementation in the "recovery" cache. >> >> ^ Why would an end-user want to replace the Clock/TimeService? >> >> Remember what I said in my previous email: I can see someone changing the >> service implementation for testing reasons, and in that case, a global >> clock/timer service that's swapable via system property would work just fine >> IMO. > > I don't know. I'm being pessimist and assuming that someone in the world > as a dark use case and needs to replace the service. ^ We already have quite a big configuration… we should think twice about adding more stuff… :) Cheers, -- Galder Zamarreño [email protected] twitter.com/galderz Project Lead, Escalante http://escalante.io Engineer, Infinispan http://infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
