On 3 May 2013, at 11:46, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > On May 2, 2013, at 7:01 PM, Pedro Ruivo <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> When recovery is enabled, the recovery manager creates a second cache. >>>> Someone may want to replace the Clock/TimeService for the "normal" cache >>>> and left the default implementation in the "recovery" cache. >>> >>> ^ Why would an end-user want to replace the Clock/TimeService? >>> >>> Remember what I said in my previous email: I can see someone changing the >>> service implementation for testing reasons, and in that case, a global >>> clock/timer service that's swapable via system property would work just >>> fine IMO. >> >> I don't know. I'm being pessimist and assuming that someone in the world >> as a dark use case and needs to replace the service. > > ^ We already have quite a big configuration… we should think twice about > adding more stuff… :) +1. on top of that we can always add it to config if needed, harder to remove it.
Cheers, -- Mircea Markus Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org) _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
