Radim, can you please give Pedro's branch a try? https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/1896 If all good we'll release CR2 from that one.
On 12 Jun 2013, at 16:02, Bela Ban <b...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 06/12/2013 10:57 AM, Mircea Markus wrote: > >>> I think we should treat this as a bug and I'll look into this, but I >>> won't have much time until after JBW. If you want to write code that can >>> handle both old and new bundler, that would be good, although that code >>> should be removed after the bug has been fixed. >> The only thing I'm aware of that's needed to support old bundling is to add >> DONT_BUNDLE to sync messages, which seems pretty straight forward. >> I remember discussing that DONT_BUNDLE + sync messages + new bundler is >> suboptimal for some reason (batching?) - am I wrong saying that? > > > This will generate more messages than necessary if multiple threads are > invoking sync RPCs, but other than that it should be ok. The main > advantage of the new bundler is that we can remove the need for DONT_BUNDLE. > > >> We're currently holding the 5.3.0.CR2 release for this. I'm thinking to: >> - support old bundling as well >> - based on the when the jgroups perf problem is fixed we might release CR3 >> or include the fix in 5.3.1.Final > > OK, sounds good > > -- > Bela Ban > Lead JGroups / Clustering Team > JBoss > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev Cheers, -- Mircea Markus Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org) _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
