On 7/8/13 7:32 PM, Mircea Markus wrote: > Indeed adding the DONT_BUNDLE flag back and using the new bundler yielded the > same performance as the old setup.
That's bad, we should look into it ! I get exactly the same or even better performance with the new bundler and DONT_BUNDLE removed. > Interesting enough, using the DONT_BUNDLE + old bundler made performance not > look good. > Radim can provide the exact numbers. That's completely counter to what I've measured; and it should be exactly the other way round ! > On 25 Jun 2013, at 16:37, Bela Ban <b...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> So the new bundler is always *faster* than the old one. And ISPN-3221 >> seems to fix the degradation. Do I still need to look into this ? >> >> On 6/13/13 12:43 PM, Radim Vansa wrote: >>> >>> | > Seems that it's somewhat better (6050 writes/s) but not at the previous >>> | > level. >>> | what about the reads? >>> >>> After Pedro's question I have tried to run ISPN-3221 fix with both old an >>> new bundler (in configuration), and the result pretty surprises me as there >>> should not be much of a difference (as all messages that are part of the >>> test should be OOB => DONT_BUNDLE). >>> >>> 113842c8cf91cbb5a1bbd26e05fab7024fdec081 (last OK build) >>> new bundler: 1.5M reads/s, 7800 writes/s >>> old bundler: 1.3M reads/s, 4300 writes/s >>> >>> 73da108cdcf9db4f3edbcd6dbda6938d6e45d148 (removing DONT_BUNDLE) >>> new bundler: 1.2M reads/s, 4800 writes/s >>> old bundler: 150k reads/s, 250 writes/s >>> >>> ISPN-3221 fix (Pedro's branch) >>> new bundler: 1.5M reads/s, 6050 writes/s >>> old bundler: 1.3M reads/s, 3100 writes/s >>> >>> ISPN-3221 cherry-picked onto 73da108cdcf9db4f3edbcd6dbda6938d6e45d148 >>> new bundler: 1.5M reads/s, 7800 writes/s >>> old bundler: 1.3M reads/s, 4300 writes/s Bela Ban, JGroups lead (http://www.jgroups.org) _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
