On 10/17/2013 05:26 AM, Bela Ban wrote: > The other thing to look at is the apparent cost of Thread.setName(): if > we cannot avoid thread many creations, we could experiment with *not* > naming threads, although this is IMO not a good idea.
I agree that not naming the threads is a bad idea. The thread names are vital for debugging -- both in log messages and in thread dumps. Not naming the threads would lose a whole lot of information. -Dennis _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
