On 10/17/13 4:48 PM, Dennis Reed wrote: > On 10/17/2013 05:26 AM, Bela Ban wrote: >> The other thing to look at is the apparent cost of Thread.setName(): if >> we cannot avoid thread many creations, we could experiment with *not* >> naming threads, although this is IMO not a good idea. > > I agree that not naming the threads is a bad idea. > > The thread names are vital for debugging -- both in log messages and in > thread dumps. > Not naming the threads would lose a whole lot of information.
I agree. This was not meant to be changed in JGroups, it was just sth to try out to see whether perf gets better. -- Bela Ban, JGroups lead (http://www.jgroups.org) _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
