Hi, IMO, we should try the worst scenario: Local Mode + Single thread.
this will show us the highest impact in performance. Cheers, Pedro On 01/20/2014 09:41 AM, Mircea Markus wrote: > Hi Radim, > > I think 4 nodes with numOwner=2 is too small of a cluster. My calculus > here[1] points out that for numOwners=1, the performance benefits is only > visible for clusters having more than two nodes. Following a similar logic > for numOwenrs=2, the benefit would only be visible for clusters having more > than 4 nodes. Would it be possible to run the test on a larger cluster, 8+ > nodes? > > [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/2009-October/004299.html > > On Jan 17, 2014, at 1:06 PM, Radim Vansa <rva...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi Mircea, >> >> I've ran a simple stress test [1] in dist mode with store as binary (not >> enabled, enabled keys only, enabled values only, enabled both). >> The difference is < 2 % (with storeAsBinary enabled fully being slower). >> >> Radim >> >> [1] >> https://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jdg-radargun-perf-store-as-binary/1/artifact/report/All_report.html >> >> -- >> Radim Vansa <rva...@redhat.com> >> JBoss DataGrid QA >> >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > Cheers, > _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev