What's the point for these tests? On 20 Jan 2014 15:48, "Radim Vansa" <rva...@redhat.com> wrote:
> OK, I have results for dist-udp-no-tx or local-no-tx modes on 8 nodes > (in local mode the nodes don't communicate, naturally): > Dist mode: 3 % down for reads, 1 % for writes > Local mode: 19 % down for reads, 16 % for writes > > Details in [1], ^ is for both keys and values stored as binary. > > Radim > > [1] > > https://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jdg-radargun-perf-store-as-binary/4/artifact/report/All_report.html > > On 01/20/2014 11:14 AM, Pedro Ruivo wrote: > > > > On 01/20/2014 10:07 AM, Mircea Markus wrote: > >> Would be interesting to see as well, though performance figure would > not include the network latency, hence it would not tell much about the > benefit of using this on a real life system. > > that's my point. I'm interested to see the worst scenario since all > > other cluster modes, will have a lower (or none) impact in performance. > > > > Of course, the best scenario would be only each node have access to > > remote keys... > > > > Pedro > > > >> On Jan 20, 2014, at 9:48 AM, Pedro Ruivo <pe...@infinispan.org> wrote: > >> > >>> IMO, we should try the worst scenario: Local Mode + Single thread. > >>> > >>> this will show us the highest impact in performance. > >> Cheers, > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > infinispan-dev mailing list > > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > > -- > Radim Vansa <rva...@redhat.com> > JBoss DataGrid QA > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev >
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev