>> And I changed the UID for nobody from -2 to 60001.
>
>Please do not do this. -2 has the virtue that it's
>unambiguous (i.e., doesn't depend on being stored as
>a signed value of a particular size), and is a clear
>sentinel value outside the normal range of valid UIDs.
>60001 is smack-dab in the middle of the UID space on
>systems that support large UIDs, and will force nearly
>every program that deals with UIDs to make explicit
>checks for that value even if they don't know or care
>about user nobody.
The problem is that this value is not common across operating systems.
Solaris 2 has nobody defined as 60001.
jeff
- defining system accounts and groups in DCE or AFS Bill Fithen
- Re: defining system accounts and groups in D... Ben_Cox
- Re: defining system accounts and groups ... Thomas Richard Stevenson
- Re: defining system accounts and groups in D... David McNab
- Re: defining system accounts and groups ... Bill Fithen
- Re: defining system accounts and gro... Will Hopkins
- Re: defining system accounts and... Jeffrey Carpenter
- Re: defining system account... Thomas Richard Stevenson
- Re: defining system acc... Marcus Watts
- Re: defining system... Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: defining system... t . sippel-dau
- Re: defining system accounts and... Bill Fithen
- Re: defining system account... Will Hopkins
- Re: defining system account... Rajesh_Agarwalla
- Re: defining system accounts and groups in D... Bill Cattey
- Re: defining system accounts and groups ... Bill Sommerfeld
