>> _However_ ... the principal conversion code in MIT Kerberos 5 >> assumes that your V4 instance names are "short". I don't know how >> it behaves if you're using FQDNs for instances with V4. So beware >> if you're planning on migrating. > >Actually, we did migrate, and it works just fine. You sure like proving me wrong, don't you? :-) Fair enough; it's pretty obvious that "long" V4 instances work just fine. So having a PTS entry with multiple periods is obviously fine as well (which was the entire point of this discussion :-) ). --Ken
- Re: periods in user names (was /usr/afsws/etc/uss) Michael Niksch
- Re: periods in user names (was /usr/afsws/etc/u... Ken Hornstein
- Re: periods in user names (was /usr/afsws/etc/uss) Magnus Sandberg
- Re: periods in user names (was /usr/afsws/etc/uss) Tony_Mauro
- Re: periods in user names (was /usr/afsws/etc/u... Randall S. Winchester
- Re: periods in user names (was /usr/afsws/etc/u... Ken Hornstein
- Re: periods in user names (was /usr/afsws/e... Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: periods in user names (was /usr/afs... Ben_Cox
- Re: periods in user names (was /usr/afs... Ken Hornstein
- Re: periods in user names (was /usr... Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: periods in user names (was... Ken Hornstein
- Re: periods in user names (was /usr/afs... Randall S. Winchester
- Re: periods in user names (was /usr... Jeffrey Hutzelman
