The same scenario applies to IBM Burlington, Fishkill, and Endicott.
We will be moving slowly and cautiously.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken Paquette IBM Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Distributed Computing Services Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D54/615-1 IBMMAIL: USIB1X62 at IBMMAIL
Burlington Vt. BITNET: KEN at VNET
I&TSS North East Region VNET: KEN at BTV
Voice: (802) 871-4014 (tie 435) Fax: (802) 871-4253 (tie 435)
------------------ Referenced E-Mail ----------------------------
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 92 20:14:01 CST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Bob Oesterlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DFS immentent?
Reply-To: "Bob Oesterlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'd like to echo Pam's thoughts. I don't see us (IBM Rochester) using
DFS for a while. Lets see:
IBM will ship DFS for the RS/6000 6/93. That means that I might see the
tape by the middle of the summer. The first release will have plenty of
bugs, so I'd expect to have them fixed about 12/93. That means we *may*
have some production DFS clients/servers in late 1993. Most likely I
won't use DFS in a large scale until mid-late 1994. We'll probably use
AFS until early 1995 at least.
I wouldn't toss my AFS manuals yet. Any schedule for AFS 3.4 and AFS 3.5
yet? ;-)
Bob Oesterlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
