>  Using the actual IP address instead of a wildcard, I was able to
>  reproduce the situation you described: a user on the client with no
>  tokens is a member of system:authuser.  (I should have been more
>  thorough when playing around with this yesterday, but opted to save
>  time instead.)
>  
>  This seems like a bad thing to me.  Does anyone see a reason that it
>  would be desirable to have specific IP address entries lead to
>  system:authuser membership?  If not, I'll have the code changed.

Somehow, I thought that was the point - by putting the machine on
the ACL, *any* user (most usefully, root) would be able to have
the specified access to the directory.  How else would this work?
There should be a difference between ip_addr:user (_only_
that user) and ip_addr on an ACL, of course...

Pat Wilson
Systems Manager, NORTHSTAR
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to