[EMAIL PROTECTED] says: > Actually, NFS scales reasonably well. > With 10,000 accounts, we put 1000 accounts on each NFS server, > probalistically, only 10% of those are reading or writing a file at a > time, so the system does just fine. > > Where did you put the volumes, like /usr, that every client uses all the > time? > > We migrated off NFS over the Summer of 1992, not because NFS didn't > scale, but because managing those 1000 filesystems on each server was a > nightmare. > > In other words, NFS doesn't scale. We manage 3000 user accounts with NFS and global automount map management -- all works quite well. We are trying to move to AFS mostly for things like replication for availability, not for performance reasons per se. Perry
- PC Interconnection using AFS clemc
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS Bob Dew
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS clemc
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS Bill Cattey
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS Marcus Watts
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS Bill Cattey
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS Bob Dew
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS Matt Hardin
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS Jim . Rees
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS Perry E. Metzger
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS Bill Cattey
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS Marcus Watts
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS peter honeyman
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS Bill Cattey
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS peter honeyman
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS peter honeyman
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS clemc
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS peter honeyman
- Re: PC Interconnection using AFS Matt Hardin
