Instead of all this talk about the new features we do or
do not want in AFS 3.5 how about Transarc(IBM) porting AFS
to more new OS versions more quickly. That is the number
one item that would make AFS better serve my needs.
I can deal with having an admin release a volume, but 
needing new OS features on some clients and not being able
to upgrade because AFS does not exist for that OS is a 
big problem.

                                John Allen

Reply via email to