|>Instead of all this talk about the new features we do or
|>do not want in AFS 3.5 how about Transarc(IBM) porting AFS
|>to more new OS versions more quickly. That is the number
|>one item that would make AFS better serve my needs.
|>I can deal with having an admin release a volume, but
|>needing new OS features on some clients and not being able
|>to upgrade because AFS does not exist for that OS is a
|>big problem.
Finally, there is one more voice of reason out there. New features of
AFS would be nice.
Having AFS running period would be even better. Get with it folks.
George.
