We are using the Solaris AFS 3.6 server binaries in a production
environment--although our cell is small. We have 3 servers spinning ~70
GB each. We have around 600 volumes ranging in size from a few Kb to 8 Gb.
No serious problems or issues yet (we upgrade 2 weeks ago)...
Cheers,
Stephen
--
Stephen Joyce
UNIX System Administrator / Network Administrator
P A N I C Physics & Astronomy Department
Physics & Astronomy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Network Infrastructure voice: (919) 962-6494
and Computing fax: (919) 962-0480
On 31 May 2000, Karsten Thygesen wrote:
> >>>>> "Jay" == Jay Judkowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jay> Hello,
> Jay> I sent mail about this before but got no reply. Sorry to send
> Jay> it out
> Jay> again. We're just really curious...
>
> Jay> Is anyone in the entire world using AFS 3.6 DB servers? We
> Jay> are in need
> Jay> of some of its features but are wary of new code.
>
> Jay> So, if we have to upgrade, we'd like to know who's done it
> Jay> before us
> Jay> and what issues they ran into.
>
> We use 3.6 in production on both Sun/Solaris-7 and Linux (even a
> Debian machine)
>
> The upgrade from 3.5 was entirely painless (a matter of substituting
> the binaries and restart).
>
> However, our cell is still very small (2 servers, 300 volumes).
>
> Karsten
>
