We need it extremely badly. In my opinion, not having a K5 native afs will be
its kiss of death many years down the road. With Microsoft selecting K5, it
would have been one of Transarc's best decisions to have a K5 implementation
released at this point.
Mark Giuffrida
CAEN Systems Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------- Forwarded Message
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 07 Jun 2000 19:41:15 -0700
Subject: Re: Kerberos V in AFS?
Ken Hornstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have to say that I, for one, am rather pissed about the whole thing;
> Transarc very clearly in my mind told everyone MULTIPLE times that V5
> support was in the works, and now they've gone back on that promise. If
> it was just _us_ asking about V5 support, I'd understand, but at the
> last Decorum I went to there was a lot of interest in V5 support; I
> really don't understand why this happened.
Is there anyone running AFS currently who *isn't* interested in V5
support? I'd be somewhat surprised if there were; Kerberos V4 is dead and
a growing amount of software will interoperate with V5 and never will with
V4.
- --
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
------- End of Forwarded Message
