Greg seems to claim that his system is correct (although in one personal
correspondence with him he admitted not being RFC-compliant (although he did
give an excuse)). He also claims that many other systems are (or will be)
configured the way his is. It seems to me that the fact is more people are
having problems with his system than these same people are having problems with
other systems. Greg, the facts speak for themselves, noone (or hardly anyone)
else configures their systems the way you do and, (at least most) everyone else
relies on systems being RFC-compliant the way it's stated, not the way you say
it was intended.
Noel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/14/2000 05:36:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Noel L Yap)
Subject: RE: ANN: Greg A. Woods - I am putting you on my blocking list, U give
no choice :(
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2000 7:54 AM
> [ On Saturday, February 12, 2000 at 17:32:48 (CST), Win32 M$ wrote: ]
> > Sorry to the others for using this forum, but have no other way :(
> Actually there are a plethora of ways....
Is it just me? I don't think I would ever say that there are many ways to do
something without mentioning any.
Greg, the problem is on your end.
To me, it's like a vending machine which rejects a perfectly good quarter.
The problem isn't with the quarter, it's with the machine. The machine
should be loose enough to accept almost all legitimate change. There would
be some slight danger that occasionally it would accept a counterfeit.
You have been bouncing back a lot of legitimate mail. The rest of us are not
flooded with junk mail, yet we get all of our legitimate mail. I consider
your mail system to be broken.
This is especially annoying because you send a lot of mail, and a lot of it
is incendiary.
Jerry
