> > For reasons stated below, I think of adding pam to cvs. My
...
> If you're going to generalize the authentication mechanism, I strongly
> recommend generalizing it in the direction of SASL rather
> than just PAM.
> They're not opposing ideas; in fact, PAM becomes considerably
> more useful
> in more circumstances if you have SASL as well.
I don't even know what SASL is.. I have lloked into PAM and the Linux-PAM
Application Developers' Guide, and it doesn't seem that hard to implement.
Would SASL be as easy?
Regards, EOF
