On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 01:25:47PM -0400, Bill Stull wrote:
> Facetious comments are not usually appreciated. I am sure
> GNU would like to maintain some level of professionalism.
I don't know, if I get you right - sorry for my limited
English - but if this is kind of criticism to my mails, feel
free to do it to me. I am not GNU, I am not CVS.
> Apparently I have not made myself very clear. WinCVS 1.06
> utilizes a type of GUI display interface with windows,
> icons, radio buttons.... I hope everyone agrees on that at
> least.
One more time, and you lose someone who give answers to your
questions ...
> As for statement 2, Platform is again WinCVS 1.06 running
> on a NT workstation with no custom scripts. Here is a
> sample for you. 1.6 is the current revision of
> CabsDBClass.java. I did a update selection to the branch
> 1.3.2.2. I selected the file revision 1.3.2.2 and clicked
> the lock button. The response was that revision 1.6 is
> locked, not the 1.3.2.2 I had highlighted when I clicked
> the lock button. Does that not sound like the lock for
> the branch is not working. Is this perhaps a misstatement
> and it should read all revisions of the file are locked,
> or can someone else modify a different branch of this
> file? Either way, I did not get the same results in you
> example, but then I have no idea if you performed the same
> steps I did. You can see what I get below.
I do not use Microsoft Windows, but I know that there is a
new version 1.1 of WinCVS, though it's BETA. It would be
interesting to know whether the problem is fixed there or
not.
> I was also under the impression, after reading other
> postings, that this would be a typical request for a
> info-cvs group, or was I mistaken?
I am not aware of any set of rules concerning what belongs
to this list and what not. But please accept that WinCVS is
one GUI for CVS. There is a Maintainer for CVS, who normally
reads and posts to this list regularly, so I am quite sure,
that he will be interested in your comments and bug reports.
I know that there is at least a bug database.
It was simply not clear to me, that you have problems with
the GUI, since I tried to follow your description at the
commandline and got no errors or problems.
> TTFN
Me too.
--
Matthias Kranz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.belug.org/~kranz
"Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again.
Fail again. Fail better." (Samuel Beckett)
