> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Jones) on 08/04/2000 11:33:55 AM wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> Even if this is >> the case I would be wary of using this ability. >Why? It has worked from quite some time and there are tests in >sanity.sh to verify it. If I cannot recreate the structure easily comewhere else, either for testing or for error recovery, I would shy away from such an approach. It seems to me that building such a structure would involve checkouts from multiple repositories, and I'm lazy enough just to create a copy of the source modules I need in the repository I work out of and import vendor branches into it when I want changes. Rex.
- Re: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Rex_Jolliff
- Re: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Chris Garrigues
- Re: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Rex_Jolliff
- Re: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Larry Jones
- Re: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Mike Castle
- RE: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Glew, Andy
- RE: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Greg A. Woods
- RE: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Glew, Andy
- Re: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Rex_Jolliff
- Re: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Larry Jones
- RE: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Rex_Jolliff
- RE: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Glew, Andy
- RE: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Greg A. Woods
- RE: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Glew, Andy
- RE: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Greg A. Woods
- RE: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Glew, Andy
- RE: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Greg A. Woods
- RE: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Glew, Andy
- Re: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Tobias Weingartner
- RE: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Glew, Andy
- RE: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place Greg A. Woods
