Please, can we stop this thread? I think we can all agree that their is a philosiphical( sic ) difference between each side here. I also think that we can agree that each side's not going to convince the other of their arguement. Thanks!! donald On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 10:23:43AM -0400, Justin Wells wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 02:39:22AM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote: > > > Also I want to add that my patch does nothing to CVS unless you actually > > > specify the --chroot flag, and even then, it does nothing unless you are > > > also using pserver (it's an error to use --chroot other than with pserver). > > > > you still don't understand the ethical problem, do you.... > > Neither do you. Isn't there something unethical about standing in the > way of progress? > > Justin >
- Re: cvs-nserver and latest CVS advisory (Was: patch to ... Noel L Yap
- Re: cvs-nserver and latest CVS advisory (Was: patch to ... Noel L Yap
- Re: cvs-nserver and latest CVS advisory (Was: patch to ... Justin Wells
- Re: cvs-nserver and latest CVS advisory (Was: patch to ... Justin Wells
- Re: cvs-nserver and latest CVS advisory (Was: patc... Tobias Weingartner
- Re: cvs-nserver and latest CVS advisory (Was: patch to ... Noel L Yap
- Re: cvs-nserver and latest CVS advisory (Was: patch to ... Noel L Yap
- Re: cvs-nserver and latest CVS advisory (Was: patc... Justin Wells
- Re: cvs-nserver and latest CVS advisory (Was: ... Greg A. Woods
- Re: cvs-nserver and latest CVS advisory (W... Justin Wells
- Re: cvs-nserver and latest CVS advisor... Donald Sharp
- Re: cvs-nserver and latest CVS advisory (Was: patch to ... josh walker
