Noel L Yap wrote:
> 
> It's interesting that none of "cvs edit -c", "cvs edit -f", and "cvs ci -c" made
> it into this release

Damn!  OpenAve: PLEASE put these in.  We desperately need them. 
Hopefully the WinCVS folks will incorporate them as well.

> IMO, these patches are extremely important in that they satisfy most users who
> want reserved locks while not making irate those who prefer concurrent
> development -- it's the best of both worlds.

Exactly.  One more vote.

Cheers,
Laird

Reply via email to