[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.08.30 18:26:45
>On Wednesday, August 30, Laird Nelson wrote:
>> Noel L Yap wrote:
>> >
>> > It's interesting that none of "cvs edit -c", "cvs edit -f", and "cvs ci -c"
>> made
>> > it into this release
>>
>> Damn! OpenAve: PLEASE put these in. We desperately need them.
>> Hopefully the WinCVS folks will incorporate them as well.
>
>No, not before 1.11 is released. Put them in after the 1.11 release,
>and get them fully debugged for 1.12, or 2.0, or whatever the number
>after that is. We need a point where CVS is stable, without all new
>and (IMHO at least) somewhat experimental features in it.
That's fine by me -- as long as they get it at some point. Those listening
should note that, since I'm not actively using CVS now, the support for those
patches ("cvs edit -c", "cvs edit -f", "cvs ci -c") will wane, but I haven't
heard much complaints about them, anyway.
Noel
This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein
do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, its
subsidiaries and affiliates.
