>> BUT I looked in the CVS/Entries and at the of the line for this file
>> was //T1.1 the rest of the entries did not have any value after the
>> //. I read in the manual this indicates a Tag.
>> [...]
>> what does this value indicate to cvs when it attempts a commit ???
>
>It tells CVS "commit all changes to (a newly created) revision
>1.1", which obviously doesn't make any sense, as 1.1 already
>exists. (The mechanism is useful when you use "-rbranch" instead
>of "-rrevision"; that it has the behaviour it does in the latter
>case is an annoying side-effect.)
So What is the CVS correct way to revert to a previous revision
& edit it, & then have this new edit version of the previous revision
become the HEAD for this file ???
