Donald Sharp writes: > > This is starting to get complicated. Should we rework the cvs history > output for the 'T' record? I think it's better to leave the history stuff alone and let the few people who care about recording tag information use taginfo to do it. -Larry Jones Well of course the zipper's going to get stuck if everyone stands around WATCHING me! -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
- Re: hitory of the tags Jorge Godoy
- Re: hitory of the tags Alex Melnick
- Re: hitory of the tags Donald Sharp
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags) Derek R. Price
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the ta... Mike Sutton
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the ta... Donald Sharp
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of th... Derek R. Price
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the ta... Donald Sharp
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of th... Derek R. Price
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory ... Donald Sharp
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory ... Larry Jones
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory ... Derek R. Price
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory ... Donald Sharp
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory ... Derek R. Price
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory ... Larry Jones
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory ... Derek R. Price
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory ... Donald Sharp
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory ... Laine Stump
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory ... Mike Sutton
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory ... James Youngman
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory ... Mike Sutton
