Larry Jones wrote:
> Laine Stump writes [quoting me]:
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, usleep() isn't portable.
> >
> > Okay, then how about nanosleep()?
>
> nanosleep() is even less portable. (It's part of the POSIX real-time
> extensions. I think usleep() is part of the base POSIX standard;
> sleep() definitely is and it's been in Unix "forever" so it's much more
> widely implemented.)
Well, it didn't seem very hard to do, so I had configure search for
nanosleep, usleep, and select in that order, then use them in the same
order of preference, falling back on sleep as a last resort. It speeds up
'make check' noticeably.
Checked in.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
I will not squeak chalk.
I will not squeak chalk.
I will not squeak chalk...
- Bart Simpson on chalkboard, _The Simpsons_
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
