Brad Chisholm wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 09:58:46PM -0500, Derek R. Price wrote:
> >
> > Well, it didn't seem very hard to do, so I had configure search for
> > nanosleep, usleep, and select in that order, then use them in the same
> > order of preference, falling back on sleep as a last resort. It speeds up
> > 'make check' noticeably.
> >
> > Checked in.
>
> Just curious, but will a 20 ms wait be sufficient to prevent timestamp races?
> It appears the times saved in the Entries file have a granularity of 1 sec.
It's checking every 20ms whether the clock has flipped to the next second yet.
Hmm... maybe later I'll make it wait more exactly when gettimeofday is
available...
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
Funny noises are not funny.
Funny noises are not funny.
Funny noises are not funny...
- Bart Simpson on chalkboard, _The Simpsons_
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
