In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Edward Peschko wrote:
>> > way.
>> >
>> > So far no one has disagreed. So is everyone in agreement with this basic goal?
>>
>> All of that can be managed by the build system. You don't need it in
>> cvs.
[...]
>I shouldn't be told what needs to be part of the build process because of
>limitations in a tool.
Not combining unrelated responsibilities into the same program is not
necessarily a limitation. What would you say about an e-mail application
that contains a C compiler, and a filesystem repair tool?
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
