Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Edward Peschko wrote:
> >> > way.
> >> >
> >> > So far no one has disagreed. So is everyone in agreement with this basic goal?
> >>
> >> All of that can be managed by the build system. You don't need it in
> >> cvs.
>
> [...]
>
> >I shouldn't be told what needs to be part of the build process because of
> >limitations in a tool.
>
> Not combining unrelated responsibilities into the same program is not
> necessarily a limitation. What would you say about an e-mail application
> that contains a C compiler, and a filesystem repair tool?
I'd say "emacs" . ;-)
dtayl
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
