Ville Herva wrote:
>
> > If people want CVS to show line counts for the real initial revision, it
> > wouldn't be too difficult to add.
>
> It think it would be nice and more consistent. The only problem I see that
> if someone has worked around the lack of line numbers in a statistic script,
> that might break.
Conversely, you could work around this inconsistency w/o breaking all of those
scripts.
> BTW: is that "not too difficult to add" to be taken as "even you� could cook
> up the patch" or "easy enough for a seasoned CVS hacker"
>
> -- v --
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> � "you" = the author of this mail (to avoid ambiguity)
To resolve your ignorance, Larry Jones is one of those "seasoned CVS hackers".
-Matt
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
