On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 02:57:15PM -0400, you [Matt Riechers] claimed:
>
> Conversely, you could work around this inconsistency w/o breaking all of those
> scripts.
Sure, that would could be workable as well.
Do you have any ideas as to how I could work around that reliably?
> > BTW: is that "not too difficult to add" to be taken as "even you� could cook
> > up the patch" or "easy enough for a seasoned CVS hacker"
> >
> > � "you" = the author of this mail (to avoid ambiguity)
>
> To resolve your ignorance, Larry Jones is one of those "seasoned CVS
> hackers".
Urmhh, I should have just deleted the sentence as it is clear I was unable
to write it unambiguosly.
To reiterate, this is what I ment:
"even you could cook up the patch": you = me, Ville Herva, the author of
_this_ and the previous mail
"seasoned CVS hacker" = other people, perhaps including Larry Jones and
others (I admit I wasn't 100% sure Larry Jones
was one of those, but I kind of addumed that).
Again, sorry for the inconvenience, and sorry if I insulted someone.
-- v --
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
