On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 13:12 -0500, Larry Jones wrote:
> Greg A. Woods writes:
> >
> > > Is --allow-root evaluated for "cvs server" in the current development
> > > version, or is it at least on the todo list?
> >
> > Now you're really asking for trouble. [ ... slight misreading :) ... ]
>
> He was speaking of the CVS --allow-root= option that specifies (for
> pserver) what the allowable CVSROOT directories are.
So, *is* the --allow-root option evaluated for the "cvs server"
case? I did a very quick test lately trying to restrict access
to one of two repos but still was allowed to access both of them.
Since I'm not absolutely positive that I did everything right,
could somebody please verify or deny that it's worth to try this
combo (":ext:" plus "--allow-root")?
BTW: This would be one reason less pushing people towards the
:pserver: method. And being ortoghonal(sp?) cannot be wrong. :>
virtually yours 82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4 61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76
Gerhard Sittig true | mail -s "get gpg key" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
ask your parents or an adult to help you.
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
