>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paul> Paul> Unfortunately, if this is what your build procedure consists of,
Don't be silly. We have our own make tool (written in Java in fact) that enforces various packaging layers during designer compilation and loadbuild. Paul> then you lose traceability between your sources and shippables, and Paul> you can't assess the impact of any change you make to your source Paul> code. That makes it really really hard to accomplish the common task Paul> of shipping minimal patches when bugs are found in the product. I believe that you would be insane to handle Java source in the fashion described in my previous posting. My point was, however, that the language does not *force* you to keep the source in some sort of coherent order so that it's incorrect for people (including me) to claim that it does. _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
