[ On Saturday, February 23, 2002 at 05:15:51 (-0800), Noel Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: refactoring when using CVS
>
> --- "Greg A. Woods" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I think you've missed a point, again. XP implies
> > there is little, or
> > no, concurrent development -- concurrency happens
> > only within a pair and
> > since pairs only commit one at a time there's no
> > time for conflict,
> > especially not because of renames in change sets.
>
> What??? Since when does "serial commits" mean "serial
> development"? Can you please work with other people
> within an XP project before making such comments?
> Again, your thinking is completely contrary to
> others', can you please explain this? Are we to
> believe that the rest of the world is wrong while you
> are right?
www.extremeprogramming.org:
Only one pair integrates code at a time.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
